Curse

John Bloodstone · Sep 23, 2005, 09:44 AM // 09:44

/singed - sorry, can't spell, my fingers are broken, too late for me

Tactical-Dillusions · Sep 23, 2005, 10:02 AM // 10:02

Only if i have the choice between the suggestion and the current system....like a checkbox option. I usually don't like having to re-learn how i play or press buttons.

neoteo · Sep 23, 2005, 10:34 AM // 10:34

the reverse check box sounds logic , and woulnd not disturb people that like the actual system . keep it in right mouse bottum , just make availeble a reverse option , so only if you dont want to move the camara , you clic on it ...
for people like me that play FPS for more then 10 years , this is a dream , if it comes true.

/signed

Charrbane · Sep 23, 2005, 11:57 AM // 11:57

Holy smokes I didn't think to ever see this thread again.

I'm so used to holding the mouse button down now I hardly notice it. The one thing I didn't think of when I started this topic is 'how will the cursor be controlled' and if the two are reversed, will it be less desirable to be holding down a button to use the cursor?

neoteo · Sep 24, 2005, 10:44 AM // 10:44

yes , i guess the dev team , got to that conclusion , its better to hold down when you are in action , wasting energie , and not holding down , for chill out actions like savage items , chat , etc

but i still vote for the reverse option in setings

Rieselle · Sep 25, 2005, 02:51 AM // 02:51

I want to be able to map the mousewheel!

Incidentally, you can try a control-remapper program such as AutoHotKey

With a bit of scripting, you can get your sticky mouse button, your sticky ctrl/alt key, or remapping the mouse wheel.

I havent tried it yet. My one concern is that it might not block the original keypress - (eg, if I remap the mouse wheel to a key mapped to next/prev target, it might still cause zoom in/out to occur as well.)

Charrbane · Sep 25, 2005, 04:27 AM // 04:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by neoteo

yes , i guess the dev team , got to that conclusion , its better to hold down when you are in action , wasting energie , and not holding down , for chill out actions like savage items , chat , etc

but i still vote for the reverse option in setings

Yeah I would too.

I'm reinterested in trying this option out.

Seloria Lionward · Nov 10, 2005, 04:25 PM // 16:25

/signed

viet · Nov 10, 2005, 09:23 PM // 21:23

Current controls needs a big overhaul.

/signed
i dont like holding down the buttons constantly either.
& how about clicking only once to attack, not 2+ times.
Or auto attacking anything attacking you, & clicking something to stop attacking.

Zytrex · Oct 29, 2006, 11:06 PM // 23:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iteicea Destroidium

or you could do something like SWG did. You press alt and you can move the pointer anywhere on the screen. You press alt again and its a smaller area to move in and it reacts as if you are holding the right mouse button

/sign

And they could even delete every class and reinvent the game from top to bottom a few days after Nightfall is released, making it a sucky game and alienating the few players they had left that hadn't already thrown the game away.

.......... forgive me. I was actually one of the players who got rid of Galaxies well before that happened, fortunately, so I guess I shouldn't be so sensitive. :P

In truth, a toggle type action like that could actually work. What they should really do is implement multiple ways to do this. There are quite a few interface limitations in GW that I just don't understand.